Kay Hartley Mortarium Archive Project

Kay F. Hartley, Ruth Leary, Yvonne Boutwood, 2022. (updated 2025) https://doi.org/10.5284/1090785. How to cite using this DOI

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1090785
Sample Citation for this DOI

Kay F. Hartley, Ruth Leary, Yvonne Boutwood (2025) Kay Hartley Mortarium Archive Project [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1090785

Data copyright © Kay F. Hartley, Ruth Leary, Yvonne Boutwood unless otherwise stated

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License


Historic England logo

Primary contact

Kay Hartley Mortarium Project

Send e-mail enquiry

Resource identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers

Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are persistent identifiers which can be used to consistently and accurately reference digital objects and/or content. The DOIs provide a way for the ADS resources to be cited in a similar fashion to traditional scholarly materials. More information on DOIs at the ADS can be found on our help page.

Citing this DOI

The updated Crossref DOI Display guidelines recommend that DOIs should be displayed in the following format:

https://doi.org/10.5284/1090785
Sample Citation for this DOI

Kay F. Hartley, Ruth Leary, Yvonne Boutwood (2025) Kay Hartley Mortarium Archive Project [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] https://doi.org/10.5284/1090785

Die Record: VICTOR 2 2

Potter's MarkVICTOR 2
Die no2
ReadingVICTORF/G
Reading (Tomlin)VICTOR FE
Comments on the Readings (Tomlin)Reading from Die 3, where F is made with a 'loop' rather than two horizontal strokes. Followed by a tall vertical stroke, taken to be E coalescing with the border. Not G.
Two line StampTL
Additional Letters to the NameFE
NotesA faint, two-line stamp has been impressed along the flange just in advance of the right-facing wing of the spout. This reads VICTORF in the upper line, but the lower line is too faint for confident reading, C or GII[....]S? seems most likely. It is from the same die as a stamp from Bavai (Nord) in France (Carmelez 1981, 52, Pl. II, no. 25 (Inventory no. 5750/739)). M. Carmelez mentions that there is a lower unreadable line, but does not indicate it in his illustration. Rubbings of the stamp, however, although they do not permit a reading, are sufficient to show that it is from the same die as this London example. Two other stamped mortaria have been recorded which are likely to be from the same die, although only close examination and rubbings will confirm it. One, recorded as in the Douai Museum (C.I.L. XIII, 3, 10006, 109a, provenance unknown), had a stamp which was read as VICTO?/CIINTI?, N reversed; the other with both stamps, was found at Assche in Belgium (ibid., 109b), the reading given being VICTORF/CIIVTIIIS. VICTORF/GENTILIS seems to be the most promising interpretation from the evidence available, but if these stamps have survived, they will probably provide a full and reliable reading. The stamps probably include the names of two potters, which is uncommon. (Readings of stamp at Douai Mus and one found at Assche leave little doubt of the reading - VICTORF/GIINTILIS = GENTILIS). Many of Victor's mortaria, stamped with other dies, have been found in the Departement de Nord and Belgium which is only ten miles from Bavai. The large numbers of his products found at Bavai, where there were potteries making mortaria, provide good evidence that he had a workshop there. Stamps reading GENTILIS alone are uncommon but are found in the same areas. There is no close dating evidence for these potters, but they are considered to be second-century in date. Judging from the profile of this and other examples I would expect them to belong to the first half of the century rather than later; if there were any question of beginning work in the first century, it would be in the last ten years or so
Overall Date Range of PotterL1?-first half of 2nd century
RegionContinentals
IndustryBavai (Nord)
Wares or Comments on FabricsNOG WH4
Border Top: Frame
Bottom: NK
Left: NK
Right: NK

Images


ADS logo
Data Org logo
University of York logo